Automation Centre of Excellence & Governance Framework Guide
Most organisations already have plenty of automation. What’s usually missing is a governance layer over it, so jobs get added platform by platform and team by team until nobody has a single view of what’s running, what it depends on, or who owns it.
An automation centre of excellence is how that gets fixed, and this guide covers what one actually involves, alongside where a health check, a migration, or specialist consultancy fits before you get there.
What a job scheduling governance framework actually covers
A job scheduling governance framework defines who owns each job, what happens when one fails, how changes get reviewed before they go live, and how the whole estate is audited.
This is usually where the biggest visibility gap sits, because jobs accumulate over years across whichever platform was in use at the time, mainframe, cloud, RPA, and nobody has gone back to reconcile them into one view. For the wider question of monitoring and governing automation across the whole estate rather than job scheduling specifically, that sits with AAI, Ignite’s automated analytics layer, rather than Automic alone.
Building an automation centre of excellence
An automation centre of excellence puts that ownership, those standards and tooling decisions in one place, rather than leaving them to whichever team happened to build a given job first. In practice, that means a documented standard for how new automation gets built and reviewed, as well as a clear way to see everything running across the organisation, even where it’s grown up independently, department by department.
Health checks, migrations and specialist consultancy
For organisations that already have automation in place, but not the governance layer over it, a workload automation health check is usually the fastest way to see where the real risk sits before committing to a bigger programme, and it often turns up jobs nobody actually needs any more along the way, an easy saving.
Beyond the health check, Ignite’s consultancy covers what most organisations need next, including governance and optimisation for teams already running Control-M, Stonebranch or ActiveBatch; migration support for teams moving between platforms; managed services for teams that want the outcome without running it in-house; AIOps consultancy where operational intelligence sits alongside the automation layer; and automation consultancy shaped around a specific regulatory framework.
Ignite’s business process automation consultancy sits across all of this, applying the same governance discipline wherever automation touches a business process, not just IT jobs, alongside Broadcom Automic training for teams bringing more of the platform in-house.
Your Next Steps
Building a governance layer over automation you already have is usually faster than it sounds, and the first step is knowing where the real risk actually sits. If you’re evaluating Automic Automation, Automic SaaS, or workload automation more broadly, Ignite’s Automation practice is available to talk through your environment and where the platform can reduce risk and manual effort.
Get Martin’s take on your challenge
Ignite Technology’s Chief Technology Officer, Martin Hulbert, stays hands-on throughout our client projects, from the first conversation through to delivery.
Tell us about the challenge you’re looking to solve. If it’s the kind of strategic question that benefits from his direct input, you’ll hear back from Martin himself. For more general enquiries, a member of his team will respond promptly.
Not ready to speak to Ignite?
View more about Ignite Technology’s Experience here
Complete the form below to speak to Martin's team
Frequently Asked Questions
An automation centre of excellence is a central function that owns automation standards, tooling decisions and governance across an organisation, rather than leaving those decisions to whichever team builds a given job first.
Yes. Ignite designs job scheduling governance frameworks that define ownership, change review and audit for an organisation’s Automic-orchestrated estate. For estate-wide automation governance and analytics beyond job scheduling specifically, that’s AAI’s remit.
Yes. A health check assesses your existing automation estate for risk, redundancy and governance gaps, and typically surfaces workload automation cost reduction opportunities alongside the governance findings.
Yes. Ignite plans and delivers migrations between workload automation platforms, carrying over existing job logic and dependencies rather than rebuilding an estate from scratch.
Yes, where operational intelligence and automated remediation sit alongside your workload automation estate, Ignite advises on how the two layers should work together rather than treating them as separate projects.
Yes. Ignite scopes automation governance against the specific regulatory framework your organisation answers to, so audit and evidence requirements are built in from the start rather than retrofitted.
Yes. Ignite provides Automic training for teams taking on more of the platform in-house, alongside our implementation and consultancy work.
